Newsgroups: rec.music.indian.misc From: nuts@virginia.EDU (Nuts) Subject: Plagiarism and Computerisation - a few views. Organization: University of Virginia Computer Science Department Date: Sat, 14 May 94 15:39:53 EDT Lines: 86 Plagiarism and Computerisation - a few views. Plagiarism ---------- Much has been said against music directors who plagiarise tunes from either other music directors or from other styles, exotic or otherwise. I know that lyrics can be copyrighted but tunes cannot. That is probably because it is difficult to copyright tunes, but I feel that it is a good thing that they cannot be done in the first place. Tunes, ragas, taals, these essentials of a song cannot and should not be the property of any single entity. While it is understandable that ragas and taals be "public domain", the discussion about tunes is open to debate. Agreed that a tune is the creative outpouring of some poor soul who agonised over it for ages before coming up with it. But such is the nature of music that its creation must be tough but its sharing, imperative. And so it is that after the tune has been created, it must be utilisable by anyone who cares to evoke the mood. Eminent music directors have borrowed heavily from Western music. Some would argue that there are music directors who based an entire career living off borrowed tunes. My perspective is more liberal. If a music director feels that a certain tune best fits the emotion he wishes to convey, then I feel that he should be able to use the tune without fingers being pointed at him. I have absolutely no grouse against Western or African tunes being incorporated into Hindi film music. Neither do I think it is terribly wrong to use a tune by some other music director in a song. Of course, as is true with most things, I believe in moderation so don't bash me over the head with "Oh, then all I have to do to become a MD is copy tunes only!" - that is not my import. Somehow, its like cooking. I realise that the addition of certain spices to the cooking of a certain vegetable makes an excellent dish. That does not mean that that combination of spices is "copyrighted" for that dish! If I feel that the combination might work for something else, then I have the liberty of trying it out! Computerisation --------------- Recently, I saw postings which sought to downplay the achievements of a new Tamil music director who has composed some awesome music. I heard comments like "Oh, he uses computers to generate music." The MD in question later came out in an interview stating that he had not used computers but I still feel compelled to make a point here. The invasion of electronics into music has been extant quite some time now. Keyboards and guitars have turned electronic for a while. I see no harm coming out of that. As long as an electronic instrument can match or beat the range, depth, feel of its traditional equivalent, it should be welcomed into the sphere of music. With the acceptance of electronic instruments, the path is cleared for the introduction of computers into the music world too. I would view the computer as another instrument, which does the bidding of the person playing it. If the computer is capable of making better music than any other instrument, then what the hey! accept it and enjoy it. Somehow it seems to me that the persons against computerisation of music should also be naturally against CDs and in favour of LPs and cassettes. Having been fortunate to listen to both, I would say that CD quality beats cassette quality and if it is the digitisation that does so, then so be it. If digital music carries the same or better quality than the more traditional ones, then it is in the best interests of music lovers to accept, nay, even welcome the fact! -- ______ /_____/\ / \ \ / __ \ \ / / \ \/ ______________ \ \__/ / | | | | \ / | | | | \______/ |__|________|__|